Kajian – Tesis Stephen Pratama : Teachers’ narratives about the possibility to teach controversial history of the 1965 affair *Tentang inisiatif para guru mengajarkan sejarah alternatif ‘1965’

“Jadi, ibu saya mungkin dia adalah saksi, saksi mata atas penganiayaan dan hari terakhir bapaknya” (29 Juni 2019)

“… korban pun punya hak untuk bersuara … ternyata suaranya adalah suara, ‘Aku dituduh sebagai pelaku’ … jadi ketika korban bisa ngomong ya kita dengarkan omongannya.” (1 Juli 2019)

“Ternyata di akar rumput itu ada orang komunis anggota PKI resmi yang gak paham apa yang terjadi … Di situ saya mulai paham ada versi lain dari G30S.” (2 Juli 2019)

“Saya tanya kepada siswa, ‘Lebih kejam mana, membunuh 3 juta dan 7 orang?’ … Mereka pun dilema” (6 Juli 2019)

“… cara belajar sejarah yang keliru bagiku koheren dengan reproduksi kebencian.” (19 Juli 2019)

“… gua sudah yakin bahwa, bahwa ini ada yang salah dalam kurikulum” (20 Juli 2019)

“Dilihatnya kalo saya keluarga korban ya … Kalo ditanya, adil tidak? Tidak, karena saya tidak bertemu pakde saya bertahun-tahun … Sebagian besar dari mereka yang ditahan itu kan tanpa proses pengadilan ya.” (2 Agustus 2019)

“Kenapa mereka nggak menginisiasi film Senyap ataupun Jagal ya?” (5 Agustus 2019)

“Itu biasanya eee saya bercerita tentang isi buku itu sama ceritanya temen-temen Gerwani … Ya dipenjara, kaya gitu-gitulah … dikencingin, disundut pake rokok … disetrum, dikubur di tanah.” (6 Agustus 2019)

“… saya pingin memang supaya mereka … tidak lagi meyakini kebenaran sejarah versi Orde Baru.” (19 Agustus 2019)

“Dia itu orang baik-baik banget, tapi kenapa udah disembelih … Tanpa pengadilan kan itu … aku nek ngajar G30S itu nggak seperti di buku … Karena yang namanya sejarah itu bisa dibikin … Tergantung yang punya kekuasaan.” (20 Agustus 2019)

Research Article

Teachers’ narratives about the possibility to teach controversial history of the 1965 affair in IndonesiaStephen Pratama

https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2022.2070127

Abstract

Some Indonesian teachers have entangled alternative versions in their teachings on the 1965 affair, a controversial vicious and political event in Indonesia, to counterbalance or even contest the communist coup narrative in the history lesson curriculum and school textbooks. Employing the sociological tools of Margaret Somers, this paper dissects the stories of eleven high school history teachers about what enables them to teach multiple interpretations of the 1965 affair. The inclusion of different accounts in their teachings is navigated by various narratives of the affair that they acquired or fabricated in certain socio-historical and political settings. However, teaching is far from an independent pedagogical action. Accordingly, the extent to which each teacher could easily teach multiple versions was related to surrounding actors inside or outside of the school and their narratives of the 1965 affair and communism, as well as perceived absence of any institutional practice to veto such teachings.

[Download Thesis]

Teaching Controversial History Indonesian High School History Teachers’ Narratives about Teaching Post-Independence Indonesian Communism – Stephen Pratama

Master’s thesis in Sociology of Education – Uppsala Universitet

sumber : http://www.diva-portal.org

PANEL ABSTRACT: The importance of the violence of 1965-1966 in Indonesia is reflected in the volume and rich variety of narratives of the events. The four papers in this panel explore 1965 narratives from a broad spectrum of genres, from survivor testimonies to fiction to textbooks. John Roosa illuminates contradictory aspects of the work of two prominent Indonesian fiction writers. Kar Yen Leong examines the ways in which ‘historical actors’ remember and frame their roles in the events. Stephen Pratama traces the ways in which Indonesian teachers dynamically engaged and continue to engage with this thorny subject as they weave their way through varying contexts and times. Sheena Harris emphasizes the selective memory inherent in state-sponsored narratives of 1965 through the medium of Indonesian textbooks. Together, these four papers present a cross section of the increasingly rich, varied, and contested tapestry that comprises the story of 1965.

click : https://mediaspace.msu.edu/id/1_km6hb4o9

simak selengkapnya

Perspectives on 1965 from across the disciplines – AIFIS-MSU Conference on Indonesian 2021

simak pula

Tesis Lengkap

Respon guru sejarah Sekolah Menengah Atas Yogyakarta
terhadap wacana alternatif tragedi kemanusiaan 1965. Kartika Pratiwi Skripsi
thesis, Sanata Dharma University.

Guru Sejarah, Kurikulum dan Wacana Alternatif Tragedi Kemanusiaan ‘1965’ – Tesis Kartika Pratiwi dan Kiprah Kotakhitam Forum

Guru Sejarah, Kurikulum dan Wacana Alternatif Tragedi Kemanusiaan ‘1965’ – Tesis Kartika Pratiwi dan Kiprah Kotakhitam Forum

Sejarah 1965 : Kurikulum Pendidikan dan Respon Guru Tehadap Wacana Sejarah Alternatif

SENYAP BUKAN BERARTI DIAM :REKONSILIASI NASIONAL PERISTIWA PASCA GESTAPU ALA GURU SEJARAH

(MEN-) ‘SUBVERSI’  SEJARAH (PRODUK PROPAGANDA ORDE BARU/PALSU) YANG HEGEMONIK DARI BANGKU SEKOLAH

Tinggalkan Balasan

Isikan data di bawah atau klik salah satu ikon untuk log in:

Logo WordPress.com

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Logout /  Ubah )

Gambar Twitter

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Logout /  Ubah )

Foto Facebook

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Logout /  Ubah )

Connecting to %s